Act 1, Epilogue: From Board to Borough

Scene: Ilkeston incorporated.

And what has the Local Board ever done for us?  ….  Well, here is a photo of the last Local Board, as it appeared in 1887 (though it had been elected in 1886 —sort of !!) The very last ‘Local Board election‘ took place at the end of March 1887, but as the Board was only due to survive for a few more weeks, it wasn’t felt necessary for the six retiring members to face re-election. So no contest was staged.

But why wasn’t the Local Board going to survive ? This is explained below.

Seated are front row left to right: Charles Haslam, William Wade, William Sudbury, Francis Sudbury, William Tatham and Isaac Attenborough and unknown. Second row left to right: Walter Tatham, Charles Maltby, Frederick Beardsley, Samuel Richards, Samuel Robinson, George Haslam, unknown, Wright Lissett and unknown. Behind second row left to right: William Fletcher, Edmund Tatham, Joseph Shorthose, Edwin Trueman and three unknowns.

The retiring Board members are shown in red — and as two (William Smith and John Carrier) are missing, they should be among the ‘unknowns’

—————————————————————————————————————————————————————

The Local Board makes way for the Town Council

At the beginning of October, 1885, the question of applying for a Charter of Incorporation for the town was brought up by the clerk to the Local Board, Wright Lissett. Because there was a possibility of expense, it was decided that the ratepayers of Ilkeston needed to be consulted. When in doubt, circulate a petition — which was what was decided.

On January 18th, 1886, following a unanimous resolution by the Local Board, its chairman Francis Sudbury convened a public meeting of the town’s householders at the Town Hall “for the purpose of considering the provisions of the Municipal Corporation Act 1882 as compared with those of the Public Health Act 1875, and deciding whether it is desirable to petition the Queen for a charter of incorporation”.
He prefaced the proceedings of the meeting with the observation that the members of the Board were not there as ‘special pleaders’. Who was he trying to fool?
Wright Lissett, clerk to the Local Board, then set out to a rather sparse audience of town ratepayers the differences in the provisions of the two Acts.
The 1882 Act demanded a more regular and systematic election of representatives, with no person being nominated who had not been consulted. The same act introduced a ‘fairer’ system of voting; “all ratepayers stood on the same level. No person could vote as an owner as well as an occupier; but all persons whose names appeared on the burgess list had one vote – whether man or woman”. The Clerk also explained differences in the auditing of accounts, and in the position, power and privileges of Board members compared with those of a Corporation.
And none of the existing Board’s powers would be lost but new ones would be gained.
A Town Council would be no more expensive than the present Local Board. However the costs of incorporation would depend upon how much opposition there was and how organised it was. No part of any adjoining parish would be asked to be included in the charter so that he could foresee no ‘outside opposition’. Perfect unanimity would incur trifling expense. Ilkeston was now a large and growing town, the most important place in the Erewash Valley, the centre of its own Parliamentary district to which it gave its name, and incorporation would enhance its position in the commercial and financial world. Successful businessmen would be encouraged to remain in the town and not seek greater success elsewhere as was now the case. They would give ‘higher tone’ to the town and others might thus be drawn in. This would produce a multiplier effect of an improved and better class of housing, more work for builders, labourers, artisans, females, more manufacturers would be sucked in, property values and rates income would increase, more gas and water would be used, shops would grow in size to compete with those in Derby and Nottingham, population would grow, and the process would then regenerate itself. (Applause.)

And what were the chances of the Privy Council granting a charter?
In size Ilkeston was the second town in Derbyshire with excellent railway accommodation, numerous factories, collieries and other works, and the Local Board owned the gasworks, waterworks and its town offices. All points which should weigh well with the Privy Council.

With just two dissentients, (Urius Griffiths being one of them), the motion was carried by the meeting.

Charles Dickens said he “awoke one morning to find himself  famous”, but what could the feeling of that literary genius have been compared with those of pride,honour and fame, that will agitate the breast of the gentleman, whoever and wherever he is, who will some day in the near future, awake to a glorious knowledge of the fact that he is “Mayor of Ilkeston”. (Derbyshire Times and Chesterfield Herald; Jan 30th 1886)

The petition to consult Ilkeston’s ratepayers was got up and circulated around the town. By the end of March it had 1500 signatures attached to it. It was then presented to ‘her Majesty in Council’ to be considered by a committee of the Lords of the Privy Council.

However before a decision had been made by the Council, there was a last election for the Local Board. As usual six members had ‘retired’leading to this election in early April … Francis Sudbury, Edmund Tatham, Frederick Beardsley, Charles Haslam, Charles Maltby and Samuel Robinson were elected.

On June 30th 1886 a public inquiry on the proposal of Incorporation was held at the Town Hall — the proposal being opposed by the Stanton Ironworks Company, an opposition which was immediately withdrawn at the beginning of the meeting. After this, Wright Lissett, clerk to the Local Board, set out the case for incorporation which included a list of the recent achievements of the Board and little else. The inquiry then concluded.

On July 17th 1886 the Local Board heard that its petition had been successful. There was to be a Town Council of six Aldermen and 18 Councillors, The town was to be divided into three wards — North, Central and South — and the first elections were scheduled for next November.

By the end of 1886, the Local Board was still waiting for the Charter of Incorporation to reach the town. It was now expected by the end of January 1887 but arrived a couple of weeks early. In mid February there was a public reading of the charter in the Market Place, with associated pageantry, illuminations and decorations.


The townspeople had felt it necessary to celebrate the momentous event. Lace and hosiery factories closed, shops were decorated, schoolchildren had an extra holiday, and bunting, flags and evergreens were everywhere. And it was an excuse for a very big drink. Outside the Town Hall a temporary platform, draped in blue and red stripes, afforded the Local Board members and invited dignitaries a prime view of festivities while the other sides of the Market Place provided a place for the brass bands.
Afternoon came and as the bells of St. Mary’s Church rang out Ilkeston Prize Band led into the square the first group of what was to grow to an audience of several hundred children, each wearing a medal (donated courtesy of F.W. Goddard & Sons and bearing the inscription ‘Ilkeston Incorporated, February 15th, 1887’.) and many carrying banners and small flags.

Eventually it seemed that every part of the Market Place was filled with what was estimated to be a crowd of 14,000 persons.
Songs were sung, hymns played, prayers prayed, speeches made, flags waved, Queen saved and cheers raised.
Every child left with an orange and a bun (the latter made by Solomon Beardsley, baker of Bath Street) and after dark the streets were thronged with meandering inhabitants taking in the illuminations.
The Derbyshire Times and Chesterfield Herald observed that ‘several very excellent photographs of the proceedings were taken by a Chesterfield artist’, photographer Alfred Seaman, who is shortly to open a studio in Ilkeston. The same newspaper proudly boasted that “Mr. Seaman was the only photographer who was successful in obtaining good negatives, and his photographs are therefore unique”.

“Mr. Francis Sudbury, the first Mayor-elect briefly addressed the crowd from a platform in front of the Town Hall. Then followed the reading of the Charter which confers upon Ilkestonians for all time the rights and privileges of municipal government “. (Trueman and Marston)

Commenting on the prospects for the town in its editorial section the Nottinghamshire Guardian …..
“From an architectural point of view (Ilkeston) is not, unfortunately, a delightful place and the aesthetic surroundings of the town leave much to be desired. But under the new Corporation all these will, no doubt, in process of time be improved and Ilkeston may even yet take its place amongst the handsomest and best regulated boroughs in the United Kingdom…… Under a Local Board the ratepayers have not the same control over their own affairs, nor such good opportunities of developing the local resources and improving the place”.

One last task remained … the provision of a Borough Coat-of arms. The outgoing Local Board decided that it fell to their members to design such a badge for the incoming full-blown Corporation. And the Derby Daily Telegraph (April 20th 1887) was mischievous and malicious in its criticism of this decison; “the distinctions in heraldry are so fine, and the etiquette so peculiar, that only a very learned person skilled in that branch of science ought to hazard even and opinion”. The old Board chose emblems to include which it felt best represented the growing town. A sketch was prepared and sent off to the College of Arms for approval, but soon came back a reply that the proposed design was totally unsuitable and contrary to heraldry. “But with a boldness which has perhaps never been equalled in the history of heraldry, the Ilkeston Local Board entirely dispute this allegation, and have asked for the return of the sketch, in order to make some alterations”. The newspaper concluded with its advice that “the Borough of Ilkeston would have done well to leave the matter unreservedly in the hands of the Heralds”

The last meeting of the old Local Board was on May 3rd, 1887 — the day after the election for the members of the new Town Council, the first meeting of which took place from noon on May 9th. Thus, farewell to the Local Board as it passed into history.
R.I.P.
Formed at a time of parochial division and discord it ended its days in an atmosphere of happy harmony and hope.


May 2nd 1887: Election time

Adeline summarises the town at this time (i.e.the 1930s): —- Ilkeston of today, with 33,000 inhabitants, its up-to-date churches and chapels, its spacious schools, a Town Hall with a Mayor*, Aldermen, Councillors and officials, its excellent drainage system, and pure water supply. Motor cars and buses, speeding through the streets, well-lighted thoroughfares and brilliantly lit shops.
All this is very different from the Ilkeston of the early fifties of last century.

May 2nd 1887 was the date when elections for the first Town Council took place. The new borough was divided into three wards — North, South and Central — each with the power to send to the Council six elected representatives. This Council would then elect six Aldermen.
The Conservative and Liberal candidates decided together that the contest would not be fought on ‘political party grounds’ …. there would be a friendly alliance. However when the results were known they were a surprise to all but especially to the Liberals. Expecting a Liberal majority in a predominantly Liberal town, that party discovered that they had exactly the same number of elected councillors as the Conservatives; they felt ‘dished‘. In future there would be no alliance — strictly party lines would rule !! 
The Nottingham Journal (May 9th) theorised that the election was “so colourless and uninteresting to the voters that they did not think it worth while to vote their whole strength upon it. The people of Ilkeston are enthusiatic enough when there is something to fight for, but when there is no principle in the balance they do not think it worth their while to interest themselves very much about it “.

It should also be noted that the so-called ‘Working Men’s candidates’ — like Richard Riley (Central Ward) and Benjamin Howard (South Ward) — fared very badly: both were bottom of their respective polls.

At the first Council meeting on May 9th all 18 members were present. One of their first tasks was to elect six Alderman. Voting thus took place and Francis Sudbury, Joseph Shorthose, William Tatham, William Sudbury, William Wade and Henry Clay were elected. This caused vacancies within the Council which now had to be filled. Thus further council elections in all three wards were planned. These took place on May 23rd and Samuel Robinson, John Lowe Moss, Samuel Richards and Edwin Hall were elected to fill the vacant seats.

Mentioned at the top of this page, Francis Sudbury was Ilkeston’s first mayor. Some Nottingham wit had previously asked if the string of pork sausages hanging in the Market Place shop window of his nephew (and butcher) Arthur William, was the Mayor’s new chain of office.
On May 12th, after being introduced to the Bench at the first Ilkeston Petty Sessions since his election, he was sworn in and took his seat on that Bench.
This was especially pleasing to two old offenders Frederick Brown and John Daykin, who then appeared before the newly installed magistrate … charged with ‘drunk and riotous behaviour’ and ‘sleeping out’ (respectively). As ‘an act of clemency‘ both prisoners were discharged.

And in the following month, another act of generosity by Francis ….
“The Mayoral chain which (Francis) Sudbury has presented to the town of Ilkeston is a beautiful specimen of the jewellers’ art, and was entrusted to Mr. John J Perry, of Angel-row, Nottingham, to procure.
“The chain, which is of 14 carat gold, is a succession of Roman shields linked together, each shield being surmounted with a coronet. On the large centre link, to which the badge is attached, is a richly-enamelled monogram of the donor, ‘F.S.’ On each side of  the link is a beautiful raised cross-bar in front of a civic mace, each one being surmounted with a Royal crown. Hanging from the centre link is the badge. This is the most striking portion of the whole piece, and consists principally of 18 carat gold, on which is enamelled the Town Arms.
“Although the maker was confined to the somewhat sombre colours supplied by the Heralds Office, they form a striking contrast.
“Around the shield is a piece of raised gold work, composed of laurel and oak leaves, and on the bottom in bright enamel the motto ‘Labor Omnia vincit’. On the reverse side of the badge is the following inscription:– ‘Presented to the borough of Ilkeston by Francis Sudbury, first mayor, 1887, Jubilee Year of her Majesty Queen Victoria’.
“The gift has cost £300”. (NEP June 1887)

The photo below was taken on Tuesday June 7th 1887, and marked the first time that the Mayor and Town Clerk appeared at a meeting in their official robes. On the previous Sunday and in a departure from the custom, the Mayor, Town Clerk, Aldermen and Councillors had marched from the Town Hall to the Congregational Chapel in Pimlico (and not the Parish Church) to attend divine service. The police were on hand to keep the route clear.


By May 11th the new Town Council had decided upon a design (left). At the top, a leopard’s head holding a safety lamp in its mouth; the head had heraldic reference to the Cantilupe family of the town while the lamp signified one of Ilkeston’s major industry.
Beneath was the arms of St. Andrew’s Cross, between which were hanks of cotton and silk, and gloves, again indicating local trades, as was the band of lace above the shield.
At the intersection of the cross was the sign of Mars denoting yet another local trade of iron.
The motto was to be Labor omnia vincit (Work conquers all) though it hadn’t been decided how to include this — probably in a scroll under the arms


At the end of September 1887, Mayor Sudbury was in ebullient mood. The Duke of Devonshire, Lord Lieutenant of the county, had just recommended him for appointment as a county magistrate (a position he was awarded in the following month). Speaking at the town’s Agricultural Show dinner, Francis hoped that Ilkeston would extend in size, health, wealth, beauty. cleanliness and intelligence — that it would become a bright and shining light to the surrounding district, and a town of which they might all be proud.

However the Nottingham Daily Express was not so optimistic — “few will live to see such a delightful transformation effected in a town so thoroughly destitute of attractions, either natural or artificial”  The Mayor could be forgiven for sounding so ‘up-beat’ however — his speech was a post-prandial one, and of course the usual discount must be allowed.

——————————————————————————————————————————–

The 1887 Town Council Elections

As with the now defunct Local Board, six members of the new Town Council (two from each of the three wards) were required to step down each year though they could apply for re-election. So at the end of 1887 five of the resigning Councillors decided to apply — William Fletcher was the one who did not.

So the elections saw contests in all three wards. The list of nominated candidates included many of the main tradesmen in the town, several of them having sought and/or won contests previously … and several having lost too !! But the Nottingham Journal saw it as a ‘class’ contest; the workers versus the middle-class traders.

As John Ball’s name appeared twice it was presumed he would retire from the Central Ward contest (as he duly did)

South Ward candidates (2 vacancies)
Isaac Gregory, seedsman of Gregory Street, proposed by Joseph Scattergood and William Shakspeare, seconded by Joseph Tatham and Joseph Hallam. Isaac also served for many years on the Local Board and unsuccessfully contested the Central Ward at the previous election.
*Edwin Hall, hotel keeper at the Sir John Warren in the Market Place, proposed by Edmund Tatham and Robert Marshall, seconded by Phillip Ellis and John Moss.
*William Merry, chemist of the Market Place, proposed by Robert Marshall and Joseph Scattergood, seconded by John Moss and William Shakspeare. His platform issues included centralisation of the town’s water supply and improvement of ashpit collection.
George Walters, tailor of Jackson Avenue, proposed by Thomas Lally and Samuel Read, seconded by James Lally and Thomas Potter. A candidate for the ‘labour and Home Rule party’, George was expected to pick up the Irish votes which were concentrated in this ward. He had previously fought unsuccessful campaigns in the Byron Ward of Nottingham, and in Derby.

Central Ward candidates (2 vacancies)
John Ball, lace manufacturer of Dodson House, proposed by Thomas Fritchley, seconded by George Andrew.
Solomon Beardsley, baker of St. Mary Street, proposed by John Carrier and William Wood, seconded by Thomas Roe and Samuel Wood. Solomon was determined to win the seat of William Fletcher (chemist of Bath Street) who had decided not to stand for re-election.
*John Lowe Moss, clothier of Bath Street, proposed by John Cook and George Barber, seconded by Edward Grant and Charles Henry Julian. John was strongly supported by the mining community.
Richard ‘the Grand old Radical’ Riley, glass and china dealer of 38 Bath Street, proposed by George Knott and Simon Clarkson, seconded by George Walters and John Chadwick. He was standing as a ‘labour candidate’ and was a nominee of the Central Ward Working Men’s Ratepayers’ Association. The ‘maverick’ Councillor Charles Mitchell was a strong supporter and spoke at subsequent meetings to help all ‘labour candidates’.
Frederick Sinfield, brickmaker of Brussels Terrace, proposed by Mark Richards, seconded by Richard Riley. Like Richard, Frederick was standing as a ‘labour candidate’ and was a nominee of the Central Ward Working Men’s Ratepayers’ Association. He was also a Wesleyan lay preacher.
Edwin Trueman, registration agent of Queen Street, proposed by Joseph Wright, seconded by George Henry Barker.

(Not wanting to split the working men’s votes, Frederick Sinfield withdrew from the election, hoping that his supporters would now return Richard Riley and John Lowe Moss. And after John Ball’s withdrawal, this left four candidates)

North Ward candidates (2 vacancies)
John Ball, lace manufacturer of Dodson House, proposed by Peter Stanley, seconded by Nathan Buxton. John was described by his opponents as “one of the family party” and, of course a non-resident in the ward !!
Joseph Burrows, grocer of 130 Awsworth Road, proposed by Joseph Severn, seconded by William Mellor.
*Isaiah Fisher, butcher and money-lender of 2 Charlotte Street, proposed by Henry Cripwell and seconded by Jesse Hoole. He was supprted by the North Ward Ratepayers’ Association.
*Enoch Limb, grocer of Cotmanhay, proposed by John Syson, seconded by William Syson. He was also supported by the North Ward Ratepayers’ Association.
In this ward the contest was expected to be between John Ball, who had much promised support, and Isaiah Fisher who was the local candidate

*denotes retiring members seeking re-election.

The election was held on November 1st 1887, a very rainy day which depressed the voter turn-out in the morning, though it picked up in the afternoon, and then accelerated as the collieries turned out and the miners came to vote. At 8 o’clock in the evening counting began at the Town Hall and an hour and a half later all the results were in.

John Lowe Moss and Solomon Beardsley easily won in the Central Ward. Enoch Limb and Isaiah Fisher secured much bigger wins in the North Ward. And William Merry and Edwin Hall were returned in the South Ward. Solomon Beardsley was thus the only new Councillor. And the Derby Mercury was very relieved that no ‘Radical‘ had been elected.

Two days later and the heavens opened over Ilkeston at mid-day, covering the town with a blanket of hailstones ‘as large as marbles‘, accompanied by thunder and lightning, and mingled with rain and snow. Someone didn’t like the results ??

Held by Erewash Borough Council

On November 9th, at the first meeting of the new Town Council, Francis Sudbury (left)  was elected as Mayor once more, but this time to serve for a full year.

Francis was the only Gladstonian Liberal mayor in Derbyshire at that time, and the Conservative Derby Mercury (never a fan of Liberals) conceded that he fully deserved his re-election.

It was also resolved to hold quarterly meetings on the first Tuesday in February, May, August and November …. and to appoint a Town Crier, complete with hat and coat. (James Henshaw was later chosen out of the nine applicants).

Selecting the membership of the various Council committees however was far from an easy task, with claim and counter-claim, dissent and a few insults thrown in, and complaints (many, but not all, coming from Charles Mitchell — though now he had more allies to argue with him).

Was this a harbinger of events to come ?


It was the North Ward which housed the majority of the “troublemakers”. Both the newly elected Councillors there, Enoch Limb and Isaiah Fisher, were chosen to serve on Committees which were not to their liking and which they thought were of the least importance. So, along with Samuel Bloor, Charles Mitchell and William Manners, they vehemently expressed their displeasure. They later called their own meeting at the Wesley Street School in Cotmanhay to address their ‘constituents’ and there was strong support from all attendees for the actions of their representatives. There was also condemnation of the ‘up-town’ party and their councillors — perhaps reminiscent of 1864 when the Local Board was first formed amid similar conflict between the ‘up-towners’ (the posh folk who lived in the centre of town) and the ‘down-towners (the Cotmanhayites).

By July 1888 many people were urging (once again) the Council to invest in Public Baths for the community. The issue had been raised in that body by Charles Mitchell, in June, and supported by Walter Tatham and George Haslam; a committee had been formed and the area of the old Waterworks (now vacant) in Queen Street had been explored as a possible site. More land around the waterworks would be needed and this was owned by the Duke of Rutland and the Trustees of the Cossall Hospital. The Duke had given his permission to use his piece of land but the ‘red-tapeism’ of the Cossall trustees was holding up the process. So, a publice meeting was held in the Market Place (I presume at the Market Hall) at which Councillor Joseph Scattergood presided. He pointed out both the physical and social benefits of such a scheme, while the danger and nuisance of canal-bathing, especially by juveniles, could be avoided. He explained the progress (or lack of it) made by the Council but was very confident that every obstacle could be overcome. Others then spoke about possible sites (in Bath Street or behind the Church Institute) and who really thought of the idea in the first place !! (loudly claimed by Walter Tatham). Finally a resolution was passed:– “that this meeting is of the opinion that public baths should be erected in Ilkeston in as convenient a position as possible”

By March of 1888 the Council had come to an agreement with the Duke of Rutland about renting the Market Place. And so, when the October Statutes arrived in Ilkeston, it was the first time that the Market Place was in the hands of the Corporation. Market Street was shut off for three days and shows were allowed to set up there….. “and there were plenty of shows — some of questionable character, roundabouts, etc., and judging by the throng and din on Thursday night they must have reaped a good harvest”. (Long Eaton Advertiser Oct 27th)


The Derbyshire Courier (Dec 8th 1888) reported that — A movement is on foot at Ilkeston to present the Town Council with a portrait in oils, from the brush of Mr. Redgate, of Nottingham, of the first Mayor of Derbyshire’s newest borough, Mr. Alderman Francis Sudbury, J.P., to wit. This gentleman was one of those who worked the hardest in getting the town incorporated, and the compliment it is proposed to pay him is as graceful as it is well-deserved.

A committee was formed — (as always ?!!) — to collect subscriptions to pay for the portrait which was destined to hang on a wall of the Town Hall. The result you can see above. In March 1889, at a complimentary dinner attended by all of the town’s ‘great and good’, the finished portrait, by Nottingham artist Sylvanus Redgate, was presented to the municipality. It was accepted by the second Mayor of Ilkeston, William Wade, on behalf of the people of the town.

——————————————————————————————————————————-

And now … Onwards, upwards and round the corner